Single Blog

Drunk driving charges don’t always lead to conviction

Getting pulled over on the way home from a night out with friends in California can be a nerve-racking experience. A police officer may mention excessive driving speed, a non-functioning tail light or some other vehicle infraction before writing a ticket. If the officer asks the driver to step out of the vehicle, it is likely that he or she suspects drunk driving.

Under such circumstances, a driver accused of DUI may also wonder whether he or she will be able to avoid conviction. There are often several defense strategies available to fight such charges in court. A police officer must have reasonable cause to make a traffic stop and probable cause to make an arrest. A defendant may argue that the officer in question did not satisfy these requirements.

Another possible defense against DUI charges concerns Breathalyzer devices. The person who administers a test must be certified. Also, someone facing charges may question whether the device used was properly calibrated. Evidence suggesting it wasn’t could prompt the court to dismiss a case.

Perhaps a driver failed a horizontal gaze nystagmus test. If the officer did not administer the test properly or an underlying condition or circumstance impeded someone’s ability to pass a test, it’s definitely an issue that can be brought to the court’s attention. Many California motorists in the past have successfully avoided a DUI conviction by arguing that officials mishandled blood samples following chemical tests. An experienced criminal law attorney can determine which defense strategy would be most useful for one’s particular situation.

Leave a Reply